Friday, November 28, 2014
Blog Post #4
My mother has always been a "literary sponsor" to me. An avid reader, my mom passes most of her free time reading. She never watches television, and growing up this greatly influenced my love of literature. As a child, I did not feel as though television was ever encouraged. My role model never watched it, so I just did not view it as a legitimate way to pass the time. My mother set an example for me, so as soon as I was able I wanted to spend my free time reading as well. My mother greatly encouraged this. She helped me learn to read, she helped me with difficult words, and she passed along her books to me. This filled me with a sense of pride and made me feel loved. I have always associated those feelings with literature, and I believe that is what has made me love literature as I do today. My mother always told me that reading fosters intelligence and creativity. I think this is what contributed to me being such a focused reader. When I start a good book, I do not put it down and I cannot be distracted. I treat the book as work that needs to be completed, even though I find it enjoyable. I believe that this focus comes from my mother telling me that reading frequently would make me smarter. My mother never pushed me to read. Reading was definitely encouraged, but not forcibly. She was proud of how advanced my reading skills were at a young age, and we always had conversations that I felt were special because they regarded books that my other siblings had not yet read. I think that this mild encouragement fostered a love of literature in me, and her continued support as I've grown older have done nothing but further cultivate this love.
Sunday, November 23, 2014
Proposal Justification
The cost of getting rid of
bylaw 12.1.2 is financially nonexistent, and the increase in quality of life
that the student-athletes would receive in return is monumental. The only
significant cost that would have to be made is in terms of the time it would
take for the NCAA governance system to reach an agreement. The NCAA members
that would be charged with making this decision would be faced with a lot of
time spent discussing and debating a change to the regulations. There is no
real way of knowing exactly how long this review would go on until an agreement
is reached, so determining the time needed to be spent in order to eliminate
this bylaw is difficult. However, no matter the time spent, it would not be too
great of an inconvenience for the NCAA committee that would make this decision,
as it is there job to review NCAA regulations. Even if it was an inconvenience
and took time away from other regulations that need to be reviewed, there are
no other regulations that need to be eliminated as urgently as bylaw 12.1.2.
Editing this bylaw out of NCAA regulations is the best thing to do, as it does
the best job of ensuring the current and future wellbeing of all student
athletes.
Some collegiate sports
fans, participants, coaches and officials feel that removing bylaw 12.1.2 from
NCAA regulations would not resolve the financial difficulties that student
athletes face. They either call for different solutions to the problem, or do
not believe that the problem is severe enough to deserve a call to action. Some
deny the very existence of the problem. The problem is severe. Student athlete
Bo Wallace, who is plays quarterback for Ole Miss, reported to CBSSports.com:
A lot of guys go to bed
hungry at night. That's real. We have our breakfast and lunch. Our cafe is
open, so you can go and swipe your card, but dinner you have to pay for it...We
need more compensation for that just to be able to survive. If I didn't have my
parents I don't know what I would do. A lot of these kids don't have the same
things that I have. I know that their struggle is something terrible (Fowler,
2014, p.1).
The fact that numerous collegiate athletes have claimed to be
suffering from similar problems across the country is sickening, and speaks
horribly for not only collegiate sports, but also the American system for
higher education. The only way to revert this wrongdoing and give student
athletes the monetary compensation they need to thrive in the college
environment is to completely eliminate bylaw 12.1.2. NCAA recently passed a new
rule that allows student athletes access to unlimited meals. Some (particularly
athletic directors and critics of the collegiate athletic system) feel as
though this more than solves the problem. However, college athletes accumulate
numerous charges that are necessary just to be on their teams. For example, on
media days football players are required to present themselves in a suit and
tie. But, how will these suits be afforded if there is no financial income with
which to purchase them? How are these athletes going to afford travel to go
home in the scarce breaks they have from collegiate competition to be reunited
with family? To put it bluntly, they can’t. This is why eliminating NCAA bylaw
12.1.2 is the only answer to the
underfunding of student athletes.
NCAA exploits
student athletes on a daily basis. The inability of the student athlete to obtain
a part time job due to time constraints is understandable, but this should be
compensated by payment from their respective colleges. All the time and effort
these athletes give in an effort to promote their university and NCAA must be
compensated. The only way student athletes can be adequately compensated for
their effort is monetarily, and the only way college athletes can be
compensated monetarily is through the elimination of bylaw 12.1.2. Editing
bylaw 12.1.2 may be the most effective and efficient way to alleviate the
struggle student athletes face when paying their tuition bills. However,
completely eliminating bylaw 12.1.2 is the only way to completely eradicate the
problem. Bylaw 12.1.2 must be erased entirely from NCAA regulations in order to
place collegiate athletes on equal financial ground with
the rest of the student body.
Sunday, November 16, 2014
Challenge Check-In #2
To: Mikayla Beaudrie
From: Peggy Porter <pporter@ufl.edu>
Date: November 16, 2014
Re: Challenge Check-In #2
As I stated in an earlier blog post, I have chosen challenge number two, hip-hop spaces. I will be writing about the basketball weight room, and how I feel it has hip-hip elements. I am still in a brainstorming phase on this assignment, and I have taken some photos of the motivational quotes on the wall and I am thinking of how to tie these into my paper. I feel as though these quotes have aspects of hip-hop. One of the quotes, "hard work beats talent when talent doesn't work hard" I feel strongly correlates with the deeper meaning of hip-hop. Hip-hop resonates a sense of overcoming financial and social obstacles, specifically from residents of the inner-city. This quote ties in perfectly to this overcoming aspect, but that is not the only element of this space that I feel correlates with hip-hop. Hip-hop music and rap are constantly blaring, and I have actually written a paragraph about the musical aspect of the gym and how it correlates with hip-hop. A third aspect, that is delaying my writing process because I am finding it difficult to describe in words, is that this space fills me with adrenaline and a sense of power and strength. I feel as though these feelings I get at the gym are feelings that hip-hop tries to inspire in its listeners. I have written one paragraph about the musical aspects of hip-hop within this space, taken photos of the gym (and I don't know whether I should include these somehow in my paper or not), and I am brainstorming how to write about the feelings I have when I walk into this space.
10 Solutions to My Problem Statement
In another post to your blog, identify 10 different solutions to the problem you previously identified. There are three types of solutions you can propose: practical, research, or multimedia. (Try to incorporate a mix of different solution genres.) Briefly (in 2-3 sentences) explain the solution. Post this to your blog by Monday, November 17th by 9:35am.
Problem: One of the most prevalent issues amongst NCAA sports is the fact that student athletes, who are competing in an effort to promote their respective schools, may not receive pay from their school for their athletic participation, and because of this do not have access to funds for personal use.
1) The reason colleges may not pay their student athletes is because of NCAA Bylaw 12.1.2, which prohibits athletes competing in collegiate events from receiving pay for their sport. This policy needs to be changed to allow colleges to pay their athletes for their competition at school, but still keep professional athletes out of college sports. (practical)
2) NCAA should not change Bylaw 12.1.2, but should further regulate the hours that a coach can require his or her players to practice. This way, if student athletes wish for additional funds, they have time to have a part-time job.
3) Instead of paying athletes, colleges should research other ways that are already legal by NCAA policy and provide more amenities to student athletes.
4) Colleges should conduct a survey on their student athletes to see what they feel they are lacking and that the school could potentially provide to them. This could be done in various ways, from having coaches ask them individually to having a mass email survey.
5) Change NCAA policies so that colleges can give whatever scholarships they can afford. Increase the budget of the athletic department so that all student athletes receive a full scholarship (room and board included). Not all athletes receive a full scholarship, so this would help to alleviate financial stress.
6) If the budget of the athletic department cannot be increased, cut some sports teams so that all remaining athletes receive a full scholarship. Although this takes away opportunities for some student athletes, it provides a greater opportunity to the students that would remain.
7) Come up with a set of criteria for which a student athlete is eligible for a full scholarship. If student athletes are struggling financially, and they meet the criteria, they will be rewarded a full scholarship. Although this does not eliminate the need for funds for personal reasons, it will relieve financial stress for those who need it most.
8) Create jobs on campus that are designed for student athletes. For example, the school cafeteria could hire student athletes to assist with clean up or serving, and because they are being employed through the school, their work hours would be based off of their practice and study schedule.
9) Allow student athletes to accept money for autographs. This way, the athletes that are bringing in the most money for the school are compensated for their time and the utilization of their name.
10) Eliminate athletic programs. This would completely eradicate the problem.
Problem: One of the most prevalent issues amongst NCAA sports is the fact that student athletes, who are competing in an effort to promote their respective schools, may not receive pay from their school for their athletic participation, and because of this do not have access to funds for personal use.
1) The reason colleges may not pay their student athletes is because of NCAA Bylaw 12.1.2, which prohibits athletes competing in collegiate events from receiving pay for their sport. This policy needs to be changed to allow colleges to pay their athletes for their competition at school, but still keep professional athletes out of college sports. (practical)
2) NCAA should not change Bylaw 12.1.2, but should further regulate the hours that a coach can require his or her players to practice. This way, if student athletes wish for additional funds, they have time to have a part-time job.
3) Instead of paying athletes, colleges should research other ways that are already legal by NCAA policy and provide more amenities to student athletes.
4) Colleges should conduct a survey on their student athletes to see what they feel they are lacking and that the school could potentially provide to them. This could be done in various ways, from having coaches ask them individually to having a mass email survey.
5) Change NCAA policies so that colleges can give whatever scholarships they can afford. Increase the budget of the athletic department so that all student athletes receive a full scholarship (room and board included). Not all athletes receive a full scholarship, so this would help to alleviate financial stress.
6) If the budget of the athletic department cannot be increased, cut some sports teams so that all remaining athletes receive a full scholarship. Although this takes away opportunities for some student athletes, it provides a greater opportunity to the students that would remain.
7) Come up with a set of criteria for which a student athlete is eligible for a full scholarship. If student athletes are struggling financially, and they meet the criteria, they will be rewarded a full scholarship. Although this does not eliminate the need for funds for personal reasons, it will relieve financial stress for those who need it most.
8) Create jobs on campus that are designed for student athletes. For example, the school cafeteria could hire student athletes to assist with clean up or serving, and because they are being employed through the school, their work hours would be based off of their practice and study schedule.
9) Allow student athletes to accept money for autographs. This way, the athletes that are bringing in the most money for the school are compensated for their time and the utilization of their name.
10) Eliminate athletic programs. This would completely eradicate the problem.
Thursday, November 13, 2014
Problem Statement Rough Draft
One of the most prevalent issues
amongst NCAA sports is the fact that student athletes, who are competing in an
effort to promote their respective schools, may not receive pay from their
school for their athletic participation, and because of this do not have the
ability to access funds for personal use. Although college athletes do receive
scholarships and monetary benefits not received by other students, their sport
and studies do not allow time for a part time job, as many other students may
have if they so choose. The college will provide food, lodging, and other
benefits necessary to the athlete’s sport or studies, but may not provide money
for anything else. This places student athletes at a disadvantage with regards
to spending money. In order to have a well-rounded college experience, students
need to be able to afford leisurely activities and events.
The reason colleges may not
reimburse student athletes for their athletic endeavors is because of NCAA Bylaw
12.1.2, which states that a student athlete is not eligible for participation
in college sports if he or she has ever “Taken pay, or the promise of pay, for
competing in that sport” (2012, p. 2). This clearly states that if a college
athlete were to receive payment for competition in their sport, it would result
in a loss of eligibility to compete in any NCAA sporting events. This rule is
in place to make competition fair amongst all universities, no matter the
budget of the Athletic Department. The reasoning behind this rule is that if
colleges were to be able to pay their athletes, the bigger schools with greater
athletic budgets would be able to buy out the best athletes, thus making the
competition unfair. However, the primary reason that the NCAA exists is to
protect student athletes, and to ensure that they are given the greatest chance
of success possible. Although it is important to keep athletics competitive
across all divisions and attempt to allow all schools, not matter their size or
budget, an equal chance of success, it is more important to protect the actual
competitors of collegiate sports.
NCAA
Bylaw 12.1.2 does not support student athletes. These student athletes,
particularly in sports that provide a high income such as football or basketball,
are not fairly reimbursed for their time, work, and the use of their name and
character. It should not be allowed for a school to utilize the name of their
students and make millions of dollars off of their character and athletic
performance, as is the case of some high-profile athletes, and for these
students to not receive monetary reimbursement of the same proportions that the
school receives. Because these student athletes work so hard for no pay, this
Bylaw also increases the chances that student athletes will violate other NCAA
policies, as they have not other way to earn spending money. It is not uncommon
to hear on the radio or see on ESPN news coverage of a student athlete that was
caught for violating NCAA policies in order to make a profit. Common examples
of this are the selling of autographs, or “rigging” games in order to make a
profit by gambling. This should make it so obvious that if these student
athletes are willing to risk their life’s work, both academically and
financially, then they are desperate for money. Although room, board, and
education are provided for student athletes through scholarships, other
necessities such as travel to the school and back to the student’s home, as
well as money for food on weekends when school cafeterias are closed down are
not provided. The fact that these basic needs of college students are not
provided proves that the inclusion of Bylaw 12.1.2 is exploiting college
athletes.
Tuesday, November 11, 2014
11.10 Homework
The article "Reducing HIV and AIDS through Prevention (RHAP): A Theoretically Based Approach for Teaching HIV Prevention to Adolescents through an Exploration of Popular Music" investigates the lack of engagement adolescents feel when being educated about HIV prevention, specifically how this lack of engagement takes from the potential of these adolescents to learn and keep themselves safe from STDs, such as HIV. The solution that is being implemented is the RHAP program. The RHAP program looks to raise adolescent awareness of HIV and AIDs through the use of hip-hop/rap music. The program is run through schools, and asks students to identify lyrics that promote behaviors that lead to an increased risk of contracting HIV. Three terms used in this article stuck out to me as unfamiliar. One such term was "sexual script". I now know that a sexual script is an expectation of how males and females are supposed to behave in sexual situations based on their gender. The second term I did not understand was "pedagogue". I have heard this used before, but did not know what it meant. Pedagogue means teacher. Although I likely could have inferred what "self-efficacy" meant before reading this article, its meaning is more clear to me now. This term is used to describe self-confidence, or belief in oneself, especially regarding the ability to reach a goal.
Sunday, November 9, 2014
11.7 Homework
Several ideas come to mind when I brainstorm problems I would like to address in my proposal assignment prompt.
1) College athletes and the financial difficulties they are faced with.
- although college athletes do receive scholarships and monetary benefits not received by other students, their sport and studies do not allow time for a part time job, as many other students can have, and this places them at a disadvantage regarding spending money, which is important to have a well-rounded college experience.
2) College students and difficulties picking a major.
- It is scary for teenagers to make decisions that will affect the rest of their lives, and perhaps universities should offer programs that will help them make well-informed decisions.
3) Media portrayal of the "ideal" female figure
- everywhere women look, they are faced with photoshopped photographs of rail-thin women, and is leads women to believe (unrealistically) that this is how they should look in order to be seen as beautiful.
4) Negative public opinion regarding genetically modified crops
-GMOs have not been proven to be detrimental to health, and could be the key to providing a balance between solving world hunger problems and keeping the environment healthy. The negative public opinion regarding this solution to so many problems limits the potential of the world.
5) The United States of America's role as "international peacekeeper"
- Any country in the world that has the ability to intervene in crimes of humanity or terrorism to help the common good should do so. However, the US seems to do so out of selfish and underhanded motives.
6) animal shelters that euthanize
- if an animal shelter is going to round up animals only to euthanize them in a matter of weeks, it should not exist. Although this is beneficial to human health to keep stray dogs and cats off the street, this is only from the very selfish mindset that human life is more important than the life of other organisms.
7) feedlot cattle farming
- cattle that are kept on a feedlot and plumped up on foods that are not natural or healthy (either for cattle or for humans) in order to be slaughtered should not be allowed into the food industry. It is not healthy or humane.
8) police brutality
- increasingly, the media is portraying the police force for their brutality, and it causes fear and distrust in society regarding the very people that are meant to keep us safe. Better care should be taken in who is allowed to be a police officers, and this should be done by taking a closer look at their mental health.
9) Disregard of mental illnesses
-American society as a whole has a habit of not taking mental health seriously, to the point where mental illnesses are ridiculed and made fun of. This has to stop.
10) High school drop outs
-more creative solutions to preventing high school students from discontinuing their education must be found.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)